Skip to main content

AI/ML / Multi Agent Refarch / Controls / DEV

Citations and Source Traceability for AI-Generated Information

CCC.MARefArc.CN20 · DET

Attach citations and source traceability to AI-generated information so that outputs can be verified against retrieved sources and decisions can be explained.

Related Capabilities

IDTitleDescription
CCC.MARefArc.CP23Cross-layer telemetry collectionCaptures logs, traces, metrics, and events emitted by every layer to support debugging, auditability, distributed tracing, and operational monitoring across the request lifecycle.
CCC.MARefArc.CP25Signal correlationCorrelates signals across logs, traces, metrics, and events into a unified view, connecting symptoms to root causes across cross-layer dependencies.
CCC.MARefArc.CP21Human supervision and oversightMechanisms for human reviewers to inspect, approve, correct, or override agent outputs, supporting human-in-the-loop and human-over-the-loop workflows for sensitive or high-impact tasks.
CCC.MARefArc.CP05Agent-ingress zero-trust guardrailsTreats all inputs as untrusted and enforces authentication, authorization, input validation, content filtering, access control, rate limits, and dynamic policy before any request reaches an agent.
CCC.MARefArc.CP02Human-in-the-loop output reviewApplication-embedded controls that allow users to review, approve, or modify agent outputs before they are executed or shared.
CCC.MARefArc.CP16Model-interaction zero-trust guardrailsEnforces authentication and authorization for every inference request and applies input validation against prompt injection, output filtering and redaction, access control, rate limits, and cost management before and after model execution.
CCC.MARefArc.CP22Runtime protectionMonitors agent actions and model outputs during execution to detect unsafe, non-compliant, or anomalous behavior, enforcing constraints, blocking disallowed actions, or triggering escalation.

Related Threats

IDTitleDescription
CCC.MARefArc.TH24Lack of explainability and traceable rationaleBlack-box foundation models produce outputs without traceable rationale, leaving the firm unable to justify AI-driven decisions to regulators, stakeholders, or customers and allowing latent errors or biases to go undetected; observability and human oversight are the principal mitigating surfaces.
CCC.MARefArc.TH25Non-compliant outputs and model-risk-management gapsAI-generated advice, marketing, or communications that fail KYC, suitability, disclosure, record-keeping, or model-risk-management expectations create regulatory exposure; weak supervision and accountability lines turn this into direct non-compliance.
CCC.MARefArc.TH16Confident hallucination and fabricated factsLacking ground truth and faced with ambiguous prompts or helpfulness-biased tuning, the model fabricates plausible but false facts, figures, or citations, presented with high fluency that makes errors hard to catch and likely to be acted upon.
CCC.MARefArc.TH15Reputational harm from offensive or misleading outputsThe system generates offensive, misleading, or inappropriate outputs, or is manipulated into doing so, that are attributed to the organization, with reputational and regulatory impact when output filtering and human review are insufficient.

Assessment Requirements

IDTextApplicability
CCC.MARefArc.CN20.AR01Outputs grounded in retrieved content MUST include citations identifying the source documents.tlp-clear, tlp-green, tlp-amber, tlp-red
CCC.MARefArc.CN20.AR02The system MUST retain the linkage between an output and the retrieved sources used to produce it.tlp-clear, tlp-green, tlp-amber, tlp-red

Guideline Mappings

FrameworkIDRemarks
finos-airAIR-DET-013